{"id":92,"date":"2012-11-10T07:00:07","date_gmt":"2012-11-10T07:00:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/mrbiggs.net\/ron\/?p=92"},"modified":"2012-11-10T19:36:02","modified_gmt":"2012-11-10T19:36:02","slug":"did-you-actually-think-wed-get-what-we-want-now","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/mrbiggs.net\/ron\/?p=92","title":{"rendered":"Did you actually think we&#8217;d get what we want now?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Yeah, Maddow&#8217;s comment did feel pretty good.  But did you really think re-electing Obama meant sending a mandate about all the things you and I would like to see in government?<br \/>\nA couple things prompted this.  First, a friend posted this <a href=\"http:\/\/www.newyorker.com\/online\/blogs\/borowitzreport\/\" title=\"Borowitz Report\">Borowitz Report<\/a> today making fun of Boehner for already refusing to work with the president.  Which, let&#8217;s face it, Boehner&#8217;s appeal to bipartisanship was about a sincere as, well, you come up with a crazy analogy.<br \/>\nBut the other one is named Joe Donnelly.<br \/>\nWe tend to think that the Democrats we elect are like the delegates we see on the convention floor &#8211; gay-friendly, multi-cultural, greener than the Amazon, working men and women standing up for each other.  It is a nice picture but it&#8217;s not the Democratic Party that governs.  Joe Donnelly may be a Blue Dog Democrat, but even then &#8211; the first thing he puts on the table is allowing the Bush Era Tax Cuts to stay.  That&#8217;s telling.  It may not be a smoking gun, but it gives an indication of what the Democratic Party&#8217;s core values are, and what they&#8217;re not.<br \/>\nThey&#8217;re not the party that&#8217;s going to stop wars (In fact, my own representative, Jane Harman, may just be taking over the CIA directorship. But that&#8217;s a tangent).  They&#8217;re not the party that&#8217;s going to end oil subsidies.  And they&#8217;re not the party that&#8217;s going to force the rich to pay for their wars and their subsidies.<br \/>\nSure, they&#8217;ll come out in support of pet issues like gay rights and GMOs and what not.  That&#8217;s free votes.  And heck, they can even do something slightly progressive once in a while like pass health care reform.  But when it comes to the core values of our government &#8211; the maintenance and expansion of capitalism, the protection of the wealthy &#8211; they&#8217;re right in there with the politicians we call our enemies.<br \/>\nSo, practically, what does this mean, what do I predict?  I predict the Bush-era tax cuts will stay.  They&#8217;ll blame the Republican congress for it, they&#8217;ll all piss and moan till they pass the same budget this year that they did last year.  So will oil subsidies.  Calls and clamors for the &#8220;fiscal cliff&#8221; and &#8220;the looming deficit crisis&#8221; will continue.  And while Obama&#8217;s demand that the rich pay their fair share sounds powerful now, it won&#8217;t withstand the political pressure of the bourgeois press to gut Social Security and Medicare.  And let&#8217;s let alone that the employment options people had as recently as six years ago aren&#8217;t coming back.  These issues were drowned out by concerns about legitimate rape and global warming, but they are long-term issues that will become louder in the next election cycle.<br \/>\nAnd those are the real bread and butter issues that our government is discussing.  Unfortunately, those are the issues that your more knee-jerk progressives prefer to ignore in favor of the isolated politics of &#8220;let me have my organic food and weed and let people marry whoever they want.&#8221;  And that worries me &#8211; this sick kind of progressivism in this country, some call it &#8220;social liberal\/economic conservative&#8221; but I call it being okay with barbarism.  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Yeah, Maddow&#8217;s comment did feel pretty good. But did you really think re-electing Obama meant sending a mandate about all the things you and I would like to see in government? A couple things prompted this. First, a friend posted this Borowitz Report today making fun of Boehner for already refusing to work with the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[7],"tags":[16,18,17,19],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/mrbiggs.net\/ron\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/mrbiggs.net\/ron\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/mrbiggs.net\/ron\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/mrbiggs.net\/ron\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/mrbiggs.net\/ron\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=92"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"http:\/\/mrbiggs.net\/ron\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":105,"href":"http:\/\/mrbiggs.net\/ron\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/92\/revisions\/105"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/mrbiggs.net\/ron\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=92"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/mrbiggs.net\/ron\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=92"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/mrbiggs.net\/ron\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=92"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}